Providers Must Spend More on Anti-Jamming – Discussion in GPS World

August 16, 2016

Written by Editor

This is a great set of Q&A from “GPS World.” It lays out the case for the R&D budget requirements for protecting GPS from jamming. Some highlights – receiver manufacturers must now:

  • Include options for jamming. It is no longer something to simply consider. Note: there was no discussion of spoofing, a much more dangerous disruption.
  • Increase their investment in the design and integration of solutions that provide robustness/resilience.
  • Expect to expend an additional 50% for R&D for military and CI/KR, and 10%-20% for commercial.

And this is only the investment required for jamming mitigation. A moderately powerful signal will defeat any receiver by blocking the weak signals from space.

Another good question is what is needed for continuity of operations should the anti-jam investment not work.

Expert Opinions: OEM R&D budget for mitigation of jamming

August 8, 2016  – By

What Can YOU Do? How Can YOU Help?

PNT is the quiet backbone of everything but too many leaders still don't see the risk.

But you do. You understand the systems, the dependencies, the failure chains. That insight is rare — and it's exactly what your country needs right now. Contact your government leaders and industry decision-makers and tell them resilient PNT isn't a feature — it's the foundation everything else depends on.

Start the Conversation

Use our Resilient PNT Key Talking Points to make the case.

U.S. Advocates

Find your representatives at Congress.gov, then use our email template to reach them in minutes.

When you get a response, let us know. Every conversation strengthens the mission.