Image: Shutterstock
What’s new: An Op-ed by former Space Force Vice Chief of Operations Gen. Donald Thompson (USSF ret.) explaining why the U.S. must have weapons in space.
Why it’s important: The ideal is for space to be a peaceful, non-weaponized domain. But it is not. The U.S. is more reliant on space than any other nation and has the greatest need to protect those interests from other existing weapons in space.
What else to know:
- It can be hard to tell what is a space weapon and what isn’t. For example, a Chinese satellite grabbed one of their defunct satellites and flung it into a graveyard orbit. Was that eliminating space debris or demonstrating a weapon? Maybe both?
- Gen. Thompson is a great guy, but he used the $1B/day number for the economic impact of losing GPS from an old study that has been discredited. The U.S. economy is $88B/day so a $1B degradation is only a bit more than 1%. Losing GNSS would be a near existential crisis for the U.S. and put us far behind China, Russia, South Korea, and others who have ready access to terrestrial systems. Hard to put a number on that, but if we had to, maybe a COVID-like degradation of $25B/day…

War in space? The U.S. has to be ready.
American forces must be prepared to fight and win in every theater.






