China, US Cooperate on SatNav – but US users are still breaking the law

December 20, 2017

Written by Editor

Image: Georgetown University

Blog Editor’s Note: The below joint statement formalizes (between the US and China) the principle that global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) should be technologically compatible. This enables manufacturers to easily incorporate signals from multiple national constellations into the same receiver, giving users improved accuracy and resilience.

Unfortunately, the United States does not allow use of non-US satellite signals within its borders unless the provider of those signals has submitted a request and had it approved. The European Union submitted such a request in 2012 which has yet to be acted upon.

Quite the snub to our allies in Europe. We can’t imagine either China or Russia humbly submitting such a request.

Yet manufacturers have been incorporating Russian, Chinese and European satellite signals into receivers, including cell phones, for some time. Receivers that are used all over the world, including in the United States.

Chances are you will never be accosted by a federal agent who wants to take away your cell phone because it is breaking the law. But it is interesting to know that you probably have a little criminal riding around in your pocket.

Joint Statement on Civil Signal Compatibility and Interoperability Between the Global Positioning System (GPS) and the BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS)

December 4, 2017

In May 2014, China Satellite Navigation Office and the Office of Space and Advanced Technology, U.S. Department of State, jointly established the U.S.-China Civil GNSS Cooperation Dialogue, a bilateral government-to-government mechanism to promote cooperation between the U.S. Global Positioning System (GPS) and the Chinese BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS). Over the past three years, representatives and experts from both sides have studied and discussed various topics related to civil service provision and user applications, among which BDS compatibility and civil interoperability with GPS is one of the core focus areas. Both sides have carried out extensive in-depth analysis, and have engaged in persistent discussion and coordination. As a result, the two sides have reached the following consensus conclusions regarding compatibility and interoperability between GPS and BDS:

  1. Consistent with the bilateral frequency compatibility coordination completed in 2010, GPS and BDS are radio frequency compatible under the framework of the International Telecommunication Union (ITU); and
  2. The GPS L1C and BDS B1C civil signals, using two different types of multiplexed binary offset carrier (MBOC) waveforms are interoperable, which means users can receive better service by jointly using these civil signals without a significant increase in receiver cost or complexity.

Both sides agree to continue their consultations and cooperation related to compatibility and interoperability in order to provide better services for global users.

/signature of Ran Chengqi/
China Satellite Navigation Office

/signature of David A. Turner/
Office of Space and Advanced Technology
U.S. Department of State

Statement posted on US government website

What Can YOU Do? How Can YOU Help?

PNT is the quiet backbone of everything but too many leaders still don’t see the risk.

But you do. You understand the systems, the dependencies, the failure chains. That insight is rare — and it’s exactly what your country needs right now. Contact your government leaders and industry decision-makers and tell them resilient PNT isn’t a feature — it’s the foundation everything else depends on.

Start the Conversation

Use our Resilient PNT Key Talking Points to make the case.

U.S. Advocates

Find your representatives at Congress.gov, then use our email template to reach them in minutes.

When you get a response, let us know. Every conversation strengthens the mission.

More PNT News

Russia is jamming GPS from space – SpaceNews

Russia is jamming GPS from space – SpaceNews

Image: Copilot AI What's new: Another report about Todd Humphreys' efforts, though this one has a bit more of the backstory about how this was discovered. Why it's important: We hope this helps raise awareness about threats and risks. What else to know: Regrettably,...

Inside GNSS, Inside LEO: LEO PNT – Why Now?

Inside GNSS, Inside LEO: LEO PNT – Why Now?

Image: Shutterstock What's new: A new recurring feature at Inside GNSS. Why it's important: LEO PNT has enormous potential to provide similar services as MEO PNT but with greater performance and greater resilience. What else to know: Xona, Trustpoint, (both RNT...

Why the FCC Must Reject Ligado’s Latest Plan – Broadband Breakfast

Why the FCC Must Reject Ligado’s Latest Plan – Broadband Breakfast

Image: RNT Foundation What's new: It has been six years since the FCC ruled in favor of Ligado. Now Ligado wants to change almost everything about the bargain it struck with the commission. Why it's important: Use of some of the frequencies Ligado was granted could...

New Company for Broadcast Positioning System – NAB

New Company for Broadcast Positioning System – NAB

Image: Shutterstock What's new: The National Association of Broadcasters (NAB) has formed a separate company to develop, advocate for, and deploy the Broadcast Positioning System (BPS). Why it's important: NAB has put increasing effort behind BPS since its inception...

Get PNT News in Your Inbox