Image: US Navy/DVIDS, DOD CIO John Sherman and USAF LGEN Robert Skinner
What’s New: The Department of Defense CIO said adversaries are going attack GPS on the first day of any conflict. Getting alternatives now is a high priority,
CIO is supposed to coordinate DOD PNT efforts, but is not responsible for executing any.
Alternative PNT projects are scattered across the armed services. There is no day-to-day department-level management or leadership as might be found in something like a joint program office.
DOD GPS program officers and industry lobbyists have long opposed and obstructed systems they see as possibly threatening funding.
Pentagon CIO places high priority on developing GPS alternatives with growing threat of great power conflict
The events that have unfolded over the last year in Ukraine have shown the need to accelerate the fielding of new technologies like GPS alternatives and other forms of satellite communications, John Sherman said.
GPS has served as the “gold standard” of position, navigation and timing (PNT) technology for the last several decades, Department of Defense CIO John Sherman said Tuesday. But with global tensions rising in ways reminiscent of the world wars, the DOD needs to quickly identify and adopt alternatives to GPS ahead of a potential conflict with great power adversaries because it will be those nations’ first target in a modern war, he said.
“The thing I talk about often is our potential adversaries also know how much we rely on GPS,” Sherman said at AFCEA NOVA’s Space Force IT Day. “The adversary is going to try to come at it on day one of any potential conflict, whether it’s kinetically, whether it’s in the [radio frequency] spectrum, whether it’s using other mechanisms … they’re going to try to use GPS to frustrate our ability to get long-range fires or other types of fires on the target and to get our forces to where they need to be.”
PNT is the quiet backbone of everything but too many leaders still don’t see the risk.
But you do. You understand the systems, the dependencies, the failure chains. That insight is rare — and it’s exactly what your country needs right now. Contact your government leaders and industry decision-makers and tell them resilient PNT isn’t a feature — it’s the foundation everything else depends on.
Image: Shutterstock What's new: RNTF President Dana Goward's column for the May/June edition of Inside GNSS+. Why it's important: It discusses a PNT example of how concern within the tech community does not necessarily turn into action by political leaders. Or at...
Image credit: House Energy and Commerce Committee What's new: A congressional hearing titled Where Are We?: Examining Positioning, Navigation, and Timing Capabilities in the United States. Why it's important: The hearing is being held by the Communications and...
Image: RNT Foundation What's new: Proposed legislation calling for the Department of Defense (DOD) to consolidate leadership of PNT issues. Why it's important: In the opinion of many, including the now defunct National Space-based PNT Advisory Board, poorly...
Image: Jeremy Bennington What's new: An important opinion piece on LinkedIn by RNTF member Jeremy Bennington at Spirent about intentional GPS disruption and aviation safety. Why it's important: People's lives are at stake. False contacts, bad locations, relying on...
Image: GPSJam.org - Jamming in the Baltic the day of the minister's flight What's new: The aircraft carrying another high ranking official experienced jamming in northern Europe. Why it's important: Even though jamming impacts tens of thousands of ordinary people on...