Image: Shutterstock
Blog Editor’s Note: An interesting overview article that also includes some tech details and several case studies. We especially like case studies as they are a good way to make what “might happen” real. We note that folks who jam and spoof usually take pains to avoid detection. Thus, whenever these cases make it into the press we are seeing both the tip of the iceberg and a glimpse of more widespread current and future activity.
The article concludes with some information on how to make receivers more robust and resistant to jamming and spoofing. It’s actually a bit of an ad for one of our corporate members. they are a good company and we strongly agree these measures can be helpful and should be used where and whenever possible and affordable.
We also think that establishing a terrestrial wireless source of PNT that could be easily accessed would (1) deter a lot of jamming and spoofing as it would have less impact on serious PNT users, and (2) provide users an alternative to relying entirely on weak space-based signals that could be disrupted from any number of accidental, natural, or malicious sources. Some nations (e.g. China, Russia, South Korea, among others) have already done that. Most have announced the reason for doing so as avoiding space as a single point of failure.
In the U.S. there is a law that requires such a system. Unfortunately the last administration ignored it and the current one has yet to act.
We hope the current administration’s policy is not “Sit tight and assess.”